Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 03 Apr 2010 18:47:20 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
To:        Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Subject:   Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM
Message-ID:  <4BB76308.6010309@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BB75E54.4080405@icyb.net.ua>
References:  <3a142e751003190508x6a06868ene2e8fd9ddd977f66@mail.gmail.com>	<4BB644CA.4000807@freebsd.org> <4BB64615.9060601@freebsd.org> <201004031707.34650.tijl@coosemans.org> <4BB75E54.4080405@icyb.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 03/04/2010 18:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 03/04/2010 18:07 Tijl Coosemans said the following:
>> I'm not sure the second paragraph is worth supporting, but the first
>> seems to say that 32k limit you have in your patch only applies to
>> disks with 512 byte sectors. For disks with larger sectors it would
>> be proportionally larger.
> 
> Last sentence is your own conclusion I guess?
> Please read this whole thread to see why it doesn't work that way in practice.
> At least for present FreeBSD.

OTOH, perhaps you are right and we should consider either bumping MAXBSIZE or
retiring it.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BB76308.6010309>