Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:56:18 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal Message-ID: <4C2B6922.6090300@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4C2B11A9.4020206@laposte.net> References: <4C2AB793.4040601@laposte.net> <20100630034622.GA48794@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4C2B11A9.4020206@laposte.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/30/10 2:43 AM, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > Le 30/06/2010 05:46, Steve Kargl a écrit : >> >> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:18:43AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: >>> >>> seen on http://wiki.freebsd.org/ContribSoftware, groff have switch >>> to GPLv3 license, so, >> >> So what? The version of groff in the src/ isn't >> going to suddenly stop working. Please send this >> type of email to free-advocacy or freebsd-chat. >> It has no place here. > > it was just for information and I do not know every dozen freebsd lists > by heart... so I appology. > however, you answer remember me why I quit FreeBSD, cease fire, courtesy > is the key. > > Regards, > > Cyrille Lefevre Steve K's social skills leave a bit to be desired, but the question remains, "is there a good reason to do this?" as a work to gain trade-off, do we get anything we don't already have? It seems to me that the PWB version is pretty unmaintained. it could of course be because it is now perfect.. :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C2B6922.6090300>