Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:25:14 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] GNU make 3.82 Message-ID: <F8CB2870-C3F6-4A39-A4DD-DBB649CE5558@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D799EC9.2090304@FreeBSD.org> References: <488C7790-D3E2-4441-BEC8-DD26D8917181@freebsd.org> <4D792578.6000303@FreeBSD.org> <2B21F26B-D7EA-480B-BFA2-BD12DDDB7721@FreeBSD.org> <4D7932AC.1020508@FreeBSD.org> <883EDE8E-309A-497B-A9ED-2350AC1D2546@FreeBSD.org> <20110310235432.GA11144@lonesome.com> <4D796857.1020305@FreeBSD.org> <1150BA48-1B1D-4C8E-9059-ADF5CE2C494C@FreeBSD.org> <4D799EC9.2090304@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 10, 2011, at 22:02 , Doug Barton wrote: > But if you'd like to engage in a discussion rather than throwing = around ad hominem's and pointless "patches welcome" statements, maybe = you can show me why I'm wrong. How about working from the basis that perhaps, just perhaps, I'm = _right_, and show me why _I_ am wrong. After all, right now, I see me = and a few others doing actual _work_, and others merely taking potshots. By all means, show an alternate solution, one that assumes that some = project or another, which will be a part of the FreeBSD ports = collection, will _require_ GNU make 3.82, and we can go from there. Believe me, I'm willing to listen to well thought on, start to end, = include all possibility plans, but right now, all I'm seeing is "you're = wrong" without anything substantial to back it up so, at this point, I'd = like to focus on the issue at hand and get the work _done_. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F8CB2870-C3F6-4A39-A4DD-DBB649CE5558>