Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:59:20 -0700 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= <norgaard@locolomo.org> Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD compatible mini-itx board Message-ID: <D9881CD5-FBBB-4D82-9CEC-26857C0A7E06@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4DD5657A.3030008@locolomo.org> References: <4DD37DDA.1090107@locolomo.org> <4dd4c55b.y99nUfzO1JLxPrYI%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <8333A2FC-7F31-45FB-AD56-951FA349737F@mac.com> <4DD5657A.3030008@locolomo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 19, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Erik N=F8rgaard wrote: >> It indicates that they put faster RAM into the box, but ran it at a = speed of 533MHz, which is slower than the memory is capable of running. = In some cases, doing this lets you run the RAM at lower voltage or with = tighter timing settings of CL/tRCD/tTP/etc. >=20 > Thanks, currently I have, well ancient RAM on an old VIA board and = it's not really any reliable. That with the flacky disk controller on = the VIA board is my reason to go Intel. Yeah, I have one of the VIA EPIA M6000 boards, and the IDE controller = gets flaky under load if there is more than one device attached. = Disabling the secondary channel on IRQ 15 helped some.... Regards, --=20 -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D9881CD5-FBBB-4D82-9CEC-26857C0A7E06>