Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:57:00 +1000 From: "Jarrod Lee Petz" <jlpetz@internode.on.net> To: "'Doug Barton'" <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, "'Erik Trulsson'" <ertr1013@student.uu.se>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? Message-ID: <001e01cc6a9d$8e62c870$ab285950$@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <4E62B99C.6020707@FreeBSD.org> References: <007301cc6979$a690f9a0$f3b2ece0$@internode.on.net> <4E616D6E.4030903@FreeBSD.org> <001701cc69d3$aea9a0b0$0bfce210$@internode.on.net> <4E61BA37.2060204@FreeBSD.org> <20110903134634.GA55652@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <4E62B99C.6020707@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Guys, Doug, I can appreciate your stance. I realize my problem description does not state any impact to FreeBSD and so I am unlikely to get a response on that. However I would like to know the theory behind how TCP/IP and FTP should handle this. One question, which list would have been more appropriate (freebsd-net)? Also just so you know I did get some other responses privately. Thanks you for your feedback. Erik, I think your right about testing how BSD would react. I'll run up a BSD VM on Monday(Australia time). If it works maybe I can deduce from the tcpdump why and what is does different. If it doesn't well, I'll have another test case and a little more insight. Regards Jarrod -----Original Message----- From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb@FreeBSD.org] Sent: Sunday, 4 September 2011 9:35 AM To: Erik Trulsson Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org; petz@nisshoko.net; Jarrod Lee Petz Subject: Re: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? On 09/03/2011 06:46, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:25:11PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 09/02/2011 17:51, Jarrod Lee Petz wrote: >>> Hi Doug, >>> >>> The problem itself is currently seen on AIX yes. >> >> So you're much more likely to get help on an AIX list. > > Unlikely, since what he primarily asked about was if the problem in > question also exists on FreeBSD. That is something that AIX people are > unlikely to know anything about. I'd argue with "primarily," but since one other person has told me privately that they think my response was wrong, I'll respond publicly with my rationale. 1. His question is unlikely to get answered 2. ... at least in part because he mailed the wrong list 3. ... therefore I'm trying to manage expectations. Now, oddly enough, I notice that my responses to the OP are a hot topic of conversation, but no one has bothered to actually answer his questions. Hmmmmm..... Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001e01cc6a9d$8e62c870$ab285950$>