Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:19:30 -0700 From: David Brodbeck <gull@gull.us> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: much to my surprise.... Message-ID: <CAHhngE007nd2K2kERW_SixOKTWP3B08LgmxBGmVis5KAECWVNw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E7C31D6.1040404@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <201109222014.p8MKEobt083145@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4B62F4A4-4B49-4CB5-91F1-A3C3E624251F@d3photography.com> <20110923000837.GD7704@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E7C31D6.1040404@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > Not my experience. =A0Running my own DNS is simple and trouble free, plus > it gives me much more scope to play with things like DNSSEC. I've done it before, but I don't anymore. Partly because it's very hard to provide proper levels of DNS redundancy if you're running your own DNS server. Not that the big players always get it right; I've seen ones that had four authoritative servers that were all on the same subnet. ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHhngE007nd2K2kERW_SixOKTWP3B08LgmxBGmVis5KAECWVNw>