Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:36:47 +0200 From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: d@delphij.net Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> Subject: Re: is TMPFS still highly experimental? Message-ID: <4E8A00BF.5000508@fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: <4E89ED58.6020104@delphij.net> References: <CAOfDtXMm9K_fbOmvG2gvXxDfKakkgpPt9MLifqDxa4wCibMExg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1110011122030.882@multics.mit.edu> <CADLo83-s_3H8PbbxOPPxbe0m10U0U5JW-feB294dFs%2BQ3iTWvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGMYy3ssi%2BkAuufDTHA1z6u7jRrZwRRkCCkcO94GHNGF9Rku_w@mail.gmail.com> <20111002020231.GA70864@icarus.home.lan> <4E899C8E.7040305@fsn.hu> <4E89ED58.6020104@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/03/2011 07:14 PM, Xin LI wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, Attila, > > On 10/03/11 04:29, Attila Nagy wrote: >> For me, the bug is still here: $ uname -a FreeBSD b 8.2-STABLE >> FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #5: Wed Sep 14 15:01:25 CEST 2011 >> root@buildervm:/data/usr/obj/data/usr/src/sys/BOOTCLNT amd64 $ df >> -h /tmp Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> tmpfs 0B 0B 0B 100% /tmp >> >> I have no swap configured. The machine has 64 GB RAM. >> vm.kmem_size=60G; vfs.zfs.arc_max=55G; vfs.zfs.arc_min=20G > This sounds like a configuration issue. Running without swap is not > recommended anyways. I guess it depends on the workload. In general, you are possibly right, but if you need predictable response times and you can tolerate dying processes, swapping may not be the right thing to do.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E8A00BF.5000508>