Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:52:26 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool Message-ID: <4EF4B1CA.4080800@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4EF4B151.4040400@missouri.edu> References: <4EF4A75C.2040609@my.gd> <4EF4B151.4040400@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/23/11 5:50 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 12/23/2011 10:07 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> Hey up list, >> >> >> >> Look, just a rant here. >> >> >> Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than >> FOUR security advisories today ? > > After receiving the fifth security advisory in a few moments, you will > get a Christmas message from the Security Advisory team, which will > both apologize and explain why these untimely advisories came today. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security-notifications/2011-December/thread.html > Indeed, just read the one John copied. Still sucks, but at least they're aware and apologetic about how the timing completely blows. Happy xmas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF4B1CA.4080800>