Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:30 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? Message-ID: <20120228152030.1d702439@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4CDC18.8060905@my.gd> References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> <4F4CDC18.8060905@my.gd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:52:24 +0100 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 2/28/12 2:14 PM, Stas Verberkt wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:21:35PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the > >> even branches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the > >> machine here runs 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will > >> arrive at the scene. > >> > > Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an > > uneven branch? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Stas Verberkt > > > > To be honest, there shouldn't be. > > There's an old saying that goes along the lines of "uneven are > unstable/experimental" but recent comments on the ML have claimed > otherwise. That's a Linux thing surely. I've never seen it claimed for FreeBSD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120228152030.1d702439>