Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:00:36 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Ports Management Team <portmgr@freebsd.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: irc/xchat: limit icon blinking time Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnN=_HF3ubzf2VBmLXwoAHouMW33gYsceEGOHNHRi3Vbg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FE67152.8080008@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FE2315C.50706@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxg=W=QhJ0%2BLJ_pudZmJo5yTWoWQj77NWKjWXx1sP1pLzbw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE2F673.2080201@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgme9QoKKrictteBaipGKDq5ZTycL9d6_f2X4XVYNgyQFQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FE518FB.1000802@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgneJR0ObpPTnX0EX7T82cbYRA5gq_66_qYAeqOaQqUQGw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE566CB.406@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgnnDknX6=QN6jUpGLx1CeG6jHCn8CkcaCrXap0dYJO2og@mail.gmail.com> <4FE67152.8080008@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adding portmgr here to cc: should we accept new patches which add additional features or fix upstream bugs, not specific to us, as local FreeBSD ports trees patches? On 23 June 2012 18:45, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > Several of my ports, to start with. Which is why I'm concerned at your > attempt to change policy by fiat. I'm not attempting to change anything. FWIW, why don't you upstream the patches in your ports? >> Our own stuff is completely unrelated. The question at hand is do we >> continue development of third party software by means of patches to >> the ports tree? >> And the answer has always been, "Yes." I have no idea where you got any > other idea. As I understand it the answer has always been no: we don't continue development of third party software in ports more than necessary to make it function on FreeBSD. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnN=_HF3ubzf2VBmLXwoAHouMW33gYsceEGOHNHRi3Vbg>