Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:27:00 +0000 From: David Bright <david_a_bright@dell.com> To: "net@FreeBSD.org" <net@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: DHCPv6 Support in FreeBSD Base Message-ID: <21444224-3DE9-4F5C-AE19-A97DE031D807@DELL.com> In-Reply-To: <4a318c6c-ab03-e63c-979f-502bc2afb97e@bluerosetech.com> References: <6224EC83-3A81-4CE7-83C5-674628F38958@DELL.com> <4a318c6c-ab03-e63c-979f-502bc2afb97e@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 10, 2016, at 13:06, Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com<mailto:list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>> wrote: Could the WIDE client be used instead? Unlike the ISC client, it will configure downstream interfaces from PD prefixes without needing an external script. It also completely avoids the problem of trying to update the in-base dhclient. The ISC client isn’t the only choice. I chose to work with the ISC client in my work because the current FreeBSD dhclient shares a common ancestry with the current ISC dhclient and also because the ISC dhclient implements pseudo interfaces, which is a feature that I need for my application. Is the WIDE client still maintained? When I looked, the most recent release I found was from 2008. Perhaps you have a link to a more recent version of the WIDE client. Thanks. -- David A. Bright Storage Development Principal Engineer Dell | Compellent office +1 952 392 5861 Cube J-731, 7615 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 David_A_Bright@DELL.com<mailto:David_A_Bright@DELL.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21444224-3DE9-4F5C-AE19-A97DE031D807>