Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 01:05:19 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 8f52533f6367 - main - lang/gcc11: New port cloned from gcc11-devel Message-ID: <E076186A-F859-4FDB-806C-0E632D98C8F7@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <4d98d8ca-10fe-9b1-5993-841bf3fe20e8@pfeifer.com> References: <9A51F9C8-0FDF-40E0-8FCD-4CAC55075CA2.ref@yahoo.com> <9A51F9C8-0FDF-40E0-8FCD-4CAC55075CA2@yahoo.com> <4d98d8ca-10fe-9b1-5993-841bf3fe20e8@pfeifer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2021-Jun-19, at 00:44, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> CommitDate: 2021-06-18 20:08:57 +0000
>>>
>>> lang/gcc11: New port cloned from gcc11-devel
>> . . .
>>
>> But the logic in Mk/bsd.gcc.mk still has:
>>
>> # A concrete version has been selected. Set proper ports dependencies,
>> # CC, CXX, CPP, and flags.
>> V:= ${_USE_GCC:S/.//}
>> . if ${V} == 11
>> _GCC_PORT:= gcc${V}-devel
>
> You're right Mark. Also Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk does not list
> version 11 as an option yet.
>
> I plan to address that transition in the coming week or so; mainly
> wanted to make this somewhat soft and gradual to play if safely.
Sounds good.
You might want to consider commit logs for something that has
that sort of "not all enabled yet" status including notes about
what to not expect to work yet (that will be enabled later).
My poudriere bulk is doing a variation on what I intended as an
experiment now that lang/gcc11 seemed to be in place. I did not
go review the content of such scripts first to validate the
status. (My reason to finally do an update was lang/gcc11
appearing.)
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E076186A-F859-4FDB-806C-0E632D98C8F7>