Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:59:37 -0700 From: D Scott Phillips <d.scott.phillips@intel.com> To: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bluestop.org> Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating uefi-edk2-bhyve Message-ID: <86ftra7gza.fsf@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4fb370c4-0358-8ca7-67ee-c98fd83d2740@bluestop.org> References: <86muln68ld.fsf@intel.com> <1fe3ca3f-be70-99db-e7c0-35c9194c97e4@bluestop.org> <7e84fd01c3f46268c26f9bab8b9fb9bc@lerctr.org> <33fcf111-fe00-4ec7-8a2f-7c53246d756f@Spark> <86k1gqanx8.fsf@intel.com> <8c63eb87-e3b8-2365-2eaf-a6e36424407c@bluestop.org> <86ftremzar.fsf@intel.com> <b2f90a4c-d73f-6797-aa1e-62161ad011f5@bluestop.org> <4fb370c4-0358-8ca7-67ee-c98fd83d2740@bluestop.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bluestop.org> writes: > On 3/22/19 4:29 PM, Rebecca Cran via freebsd-virtualization wrote: > > On 3/22/19 2:25 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote: > > > > > Hmm, I guess it might be some diference in the code generation > > > between gcc 4.8 and gcc 5. > > > > > > I've just tested switching from gcc 4.8 to 8.3.0 and everything > > seems to work fine - both build and runtime - so I think it may be > > more productive to upgrade and use that instead, since it's a > > supported version (gcc 4.8 is pretty old now). Would you agree? Yep, makes sense to me. For either of these changes we would want to get test converage on basically all functionality, so might as well take both changes at once. > I've submitted a couple of merge requests to update your edk2 tree and > port for gcc 8: > > https://gitlab.com/scott-ph/edk2/merge_requests/1 > > https://gitlab.com/scott-ph/freebsd-ports/merge_requests/1 Thanks, those changes are working well for me. Merged.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ftra7gza.fsf>