Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:10:56 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> Subject: Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO Message-ID: <20121103091056.00004eb9@unknown> In-Reply-To: <50944597.9090709@ose.nl> References: <5093F934.7050306@ose.nl> <5093FD3D.3080201@ateamsystems.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1211021742410.15219@sea.ntplx.net> <50944597.9090709@ose.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:13:43 +0100 Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> wrote: > I have submitted a PR with patch, see how it goes > Cheers Why aren't we patching the dump utility to error/exit saying it's not = compatible with SUJ at this time? Update the descriptions in the = installer, but leave SUJ as default and patch dump.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121103091056.00004eb9>