Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:01:27 +0200
From:      Andreas Klemm <andreas@freebsd.org>
To:        "Jeff D. Hamann" <jeff.hamann@forestinformatics.com>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: no wine on amd64
Message-ID:  <20050919050125.GA1494@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <50988.192.168.0.20.1126896492.squirrel@192.168.0.2>
References:  <50988.192.168.0.20.1126896492.squirrel@192.168.0.2>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:48:12AM -0700, Jeff D. Hamann wrote:
> 
> bobby# cd /usr/ports/emulators/wine
> bobby# make install
> ===> wine-20050830 is only for i386, and you are running amd64
> 
> grrrr.......
> 
> Any chance of finding an emulator that I can run WinXP/MS Office apps on
> the amd64 machine?

I think my next install of FreeBSD will be i386 on amd for this reason.

Another thing is that my system feels slow. I can't give numbers,
subjective feeling.

But I don't know if this is more amd64 or more 5.4-stable related.

In former times with much slower CPU (PIII 1 GHz) and slower disks
the system was way more responsive under X11/kde even under load.

Especially if I remember back to FreeBSD 4.x.

And when I got my amd mainboard new, I think the system under
5.4 i386 was quicker/more responsive than after reinstall under 
amd64 native.

	Andreas ///

-- 
Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 5.4
Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050919050125.GA1494>