Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:34:20 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: compiler info in kernel identification string Message-ID: <50A5EC7C.5050303@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50A57623.4020108@FreeBSD.org> References: <20121113234303.GA15319@dft-labs.eu> <50A3639C.9050200@FreeBSD.org> <1352907497.1217.147.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <50A57623.4020108@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 16/11/2012 01:09 Dimitry Andric said the following: > And as I remarked in another reply, now that I have thought about it a > bit, I would much rather see this information moved to a sysctl or dmesg > line, than in uname. With the happy side effect that no existing uname > parsers would be confused! I would still like to have at least compiler's "base name" or type or something in uname. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50A5EC7C.5050303>