Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:59:10 -0600 (MDT) From: "John Hein" <gnome-jfbml@snkmail.com> To: "Jung-uk Kim" <jkim@FreeBSD.org>, "William Palfreman" <william@palfreman.com>, <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Re: libxml2 no longer compiles. Message-ID: <4190-1365620354-590871@sneakemail.com> In-Reply-To: <5165AC67.2000206@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAE9Lj2=_GoiA_RY=DhkYba9ZUGi6FXjsyEt5fDcySGKELh3QZw@mail.gmail.com> <32001-1365614867-937938@sneakemail.com> <5165AC67.2000206@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jung-uk Kim wrote at 14:16 -0400 on Apr 10, 2013:
> IMHO, we should get rid of CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS altogether because
> they serve no purpose here.
Unfortunately, if you do that, the libxml2 build still fails
with if lzmalib is installed.
I agree that we can get rid of the ${LOCALBASE} parts of
CPPFLAGS & LDFLAGS (the -I/usr/local/include and -L/usr/local/lib
are added by configure due to --with-iconv).
But we still need some way to deal with the lzmalib conflict
by doing one of the other things I mentioned or force the
use of the base lzma (or ??)...
Index: textproc/libxml2/Makefile
===================================================================
--- textproc/libxml2/Makefile (revision 315774)
+++ textproc/libxml2/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@
--with-html-dir=${PREFIX}/share/doc \
--with-html-subdir=${PORTNAME} \
--without-python
-CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include
-LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib
+CPPFLAGS+= -I/usr/include
+LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/lib
.if !defined(MASTERDIR)
MAN1= xml2-config.1 xmllint.1 xmlcatalog.1
One other option would be to add a dependency on the ports
version of archivers/lzma and force libxml2 to use that, but
that seems like a waste when the one in base works fine
(after freebsd 7.x of course).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4190-1365620354-590871>