Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:27:34 +0900 From: YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: "Mr. Clif" <clif@eugeneweb.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, yongari@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/179033: [dc] dc ethernet driver seems to have issues with some multiport card and mother board combinations Message-ID: <20130611022734.GB1519@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <51B67CCA.2010507@eugeneweb.com> References: <201305300113.r4U1DRGp089692@freefall.freebsd.org> <51A6CE52.20501@eugeneweb.com> <20130530051214.GA1530@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <201305300929.31872.jhb@freebsd.org> <51B62547.5000207@eugeneweb.com> <20130611002848.GA1519@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <51B67CCA.2010507@eugeneweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 06:26:34PM -0700, Mr. Clif wrote: > Is there any down side to using that dc fix in pfsense for now? If dc(4) works as expected there is no reason not to use memory BARs. Generally using memory BARs is more efficient. Many old PCI controllers used to have bugs with memory BARs so driver used safer I/O port BARs. > > Yes, I would like to have time to submit the cas bug as well. Maybe in > the next week but probably by august I hope. ;-) > Ok. > Thanks for your help, > Clif
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130611022734.GB1519>