Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:10:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@FreeBSD.org> To: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@shaneware.biz> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" <ports@freebsd.org>, Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFH] FreeBSD 10 and ports Message-ID: <CAE-m3X2939-xX3=GPCk1R6KVu5MRbSaGar08r-_67MYQ4Lb1wA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51B70857.1090505@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <249D4A03-A62A-4033-9757-AF308D4422FF@FreeBSD.org> <51B70857.1090505@ShaneWare.Biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@shaneware.biz> wrote: > On 11/06/2013 16:20, Martin Wilke wrote: > >> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that >> we need to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs >> on the current src and we still have a lot of fallouts. We would like >> to ask you to have a look [1] at the failed ports and help to fix >> them. We will start this week an i386 exp-run to see how the status >> is. > > > For those of us running 9.1 what is the best way to test? > I previously had little luck compiling in a 10-current tinderbox. > > I see that one of my ports is failing with 10 and clang 3.3. I know it > compiles with clang 3.1 on 9.1. Is using 3.4 from clang-devel a useful test > compiler? If you have a redports.org account you can use the 10-CURRENT environments which are running HEAD from 29th of May. Otherwise you can always register yourself an account and ping me in IRC until I activate it. -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAE-m3X2939-xX3=GPCk1R6KVu5MRbSaGar08r-_67MYQ4Lb1wA>