Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:34:29 -0400 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: dt71@gmx.com Cc: webmaster@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "injunction" on the use of GA Message-ID: <20130630163429.GC9211@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <51D03E0D.3050106@gmx.com> References: <51AF2DE4.3090103@gmx.com> <51CEEE8E.8010800@gmx.com> <20130629143032.GB10180@glenbarber.us> <51D03E0D.3050106@gmx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5oH/S/bF6lOfqCQb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 04:17:49PM +0200, dt71@gmx.com wrote: > On 06/29/2013 16:30, Glen Barber wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:26:22PM +0200, dt71@gmx.com wrote: > >>Tick, tock. > > > >Yes? >=20 > - What has so far been gained through the use of GA? > - Of these, which ones could not have been achieved otherwise, such as wi= th a different tool? > - Also of these, which ones are significant, and why? > - What warrants the continued application of GA? Yes, I saw your questions. What does 'tick tock' mean? Glen --5oH/S/bF6lOfqCQb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR0F4VAAoJEFJPDDeguUajuZUH/R1KGObyHLveCIci790TSJWt 8ZEQGBKTVB/sIxhCt3X2aSSc3ws54/JnWd1O0GolHObfG+wGTuc4BfLW4zFBNphM EkadB9ABWuaP3m8dkezewf9bqDqLDb45XoFZh0MRcZWHNUpq4kc25hn3XtUINy/n +nspLlHG26XLZ5lNRmNtkbu5nr667jOut4+jdm3wkCA5+5BlUilbL1XNsk1EP/HN pXFeG9tWXBDCexoBSJOY2NnxoqmGSkH7f5bxHd6t6vqA+iUJmtIIHd6+ktUNLsJI 5zdOT/H1qVbXzQrV6QpI3cOzJIJs3M/7BWzsa4lXHsC9J00Jg3yDudXzfeUTj3s= =LE5P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5oH/S/bF6lOfqCQb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130630163429.GC9211>