Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 23:27:37 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Subject: Re: ZFS default compression algo for contemporary FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <51D5DAB9.4070507@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51D59C88.9060403@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041620420.2446@woozle.rinet.ru> <51D576E1.6030803@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041950400.2446@woozle.rinet.ru> <51D59B6C.5030600@gmail.com> <51D59C88.9060403@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
04.07.2013 19:02, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 04/07/2013 18:57 Volodymyr Kostyrko said the following: >> Yes. Much better in terms of speed. > > And compression too. Can't really say. When the code first appeared in stable I moved two of my machines (desktops) to LZ4 recreating each dataset. To my surprise gain at transition from lzjb was fairly minimal and sometimes LZ4 even loses to lzjb in compression size. However better compression/decompression speed and moreover earlier takeoff when data is incompressible clearly makes lz4 a winner. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51D5DAB9.4070507>