Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:52:16 -0400 From: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 Message-ID: <CAKYr3zyhc1zgpoUr1%2BpRqqd-3RzxMq7XaGO_QePNiF4Ne_nNFg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <520E325B.2090804@omnilan.de> References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51E1061F.3050804@ixsystems.com> <51E398F3.40008@freebsd.org> <51E3EEAA.3040106@freebsd.org> <51E3EFA8.1050606@ixsystems.com> <20130715141300.GA1986@glenbarber.us> <51E41419.3040503@ixsystems.com> <CAOaKuAVxApLLntQ0dqtGWGveveFXyHd6D_%2BVtG%2BfctszKnwF4Q@mail.gmail.com> <trinity-0aface3a-147f-4fc1-ab62-a2c25cedce96-1374003773426@3capp-gmx-bs30> <520E325B.2090804@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer < h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: > Bez=C3=BCglich Pascal Drecker's Nachricht vom 16.07.2013 21:42 (localtim= e): > > ... > > >>>> IMHO, this is considered a new feature, and not a critical bug > > fix. re@ > > >>> asked from the start of the code slush to avoid new features, an= d > > at > > >>> this point, it is too late. It is not worth introducing possible > > >>> regressions, which will only delay the 9.2-RELEASE. > > >>> > > >>> Glen > > >>> > > >>> OK, then we need a release notes telling people a sane value for > > >> nmbclusters and friends so that they know how to make 10gigE work= . > > >> > > >> I'll poll my team for a value if someone else has one, that would > be > > even > > >> better. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Alfred Perlstein > > >> VP Software Engineering, iXsystems > > > > > > > > >Is there a possibility that a separate unofficial patch set could b= e > > >released for people who want the autotuning but do not want to run = 9 > > >stable after 9.2 is released. > > >I would like the autotuning, but i am a little reluctent to use oth= er > > >stable stuff i will get when tracking stable. > > > > > >Regards > > >Johan > > > > Hi, > > > > I think that's a good point. > > > > In our company, it=EF=BF=BDs not allowed to use the stable tree for = any > > production system. Little and useful patches are still allowed. > > > > Having a central point with a description of each patch it would be > > much easier to update the release version with the needed patches. > > You're welcome using my "deploy-tools" patchsets. > I'm deploying RELENG only, but with local patchset-policy. Originally, > these are automtically handled during build-process with deploy-tools, > but of course you can selective/manually apply the desired patches from > the "local-patches" directory: > > ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/ > > Best regards, > > can you maybe define what exactly, this is and or where the specific patches are derived? Ive seen the autotune but whats the rest in here?? > -Harry > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKYr3zyhc1zgpoUr1%2BpRqqd-3RzxMq7XaGO_QePNiF4Ne_nNFg>