Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:25:24 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hans.petter.selasky@bitfrost.no> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> Cc: "kwm@freebsd.org" <kwm@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HFC-4S and pcm_slave Message-ID: <5239A9C4.80401@bitfrost.no> In-Reply-To: <5239A880.9030006@omnilan.de> References: <5239A880.9030006@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/18/13 15:20, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hello, > > thanks to Hans Petter Selasky, isdn4bsd (i4b) was easy to install and > seems to do the same great job these days with 9.2 as a decade ago with > 3.x :-) > But I had a hard time getting isdntest-connection working with my atcom > AX-4S (HFC-4S). > Accidentally I read on HPSs site that HFC-4S/8S are by default > initialized in pcm_slave mode. > I had no idea about pcm_mode – nothing qualified found with a very quick > search – but I understand the need and possibilities of clock sources. > > But why is the default to rely on external clock source with HFC-4S? Hi, This is just to avoid a conflict if the devices are physically connected. > > And how – if it's describable in one sentence – does the HFC-4S read > external clock? It depends on the board. I have not used this feature myself, but there is some wiring cables, you can put between the boards (if they support it), which also handles call-bridging in hardware. > > Is there something like 'hint.hfc.X.pcm_master' (planned)? No, but please submit a patch if you want it :-) > > Why isn't isdn4bsd and libcapi in the official ports tree? There is no specific reason for this. If you ask, the ports guys will eventually include it :-) --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5239A9C4.80401>