Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 13:00:24 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR] lang/python26 removal Message-ID: <CADL2u4hVqSafxYhts%2BP3jLZgyfy%2B2djeBdi53_8V4MEWHttFcw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52CA9855.1060002@yandex.ru> References: <52C948C2.4080506@freebsd.org> <52CA91A3.8040309@yandex.ru> <CADL2u4ha9wWvdU76vG6CE-yA3xZ7VCC1tqi1-QtyebCSVQeBKQ@mail.gmail.com> <52CA9855.1060002@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>: > Ren=E9 Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 15:34: > >> 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>: >>> >>> Ren=E9 Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to >>>> exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports >>>> referring to Python < 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to n= ot >>>> break INDEX. >>>> >>>> The patch is available at >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff >>>> The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here: >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff >>>> >>>> mat@ already gave an "OK" for the USE_PYTHON* bumps. >>>> >>>> Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you? >>>> >>>> I'm not on python@ , so please CC me. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ren=E9 >>> >>> >>> >>> I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that wou= ld >>> be >>> great to be fixed before commiting: >>> - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch >> >> This is because I converted -2.7 to 2.7 etc. Are you saying that all >> USE_PYTHON*=3D2.7 should be converted to USE_PYTHON*=3D2 and that >> other USE_PYTHON* values are OK ? > > > I just looked at it again: > > -2.7 and 2.7 should be converted to just `2' > 2.x+ should be converted to just `yes' to keep it's current meaning > > Will this `yes'-ports actually build with 3.x - that will be checked late= r > for all the tree. I have plans for this. > I'll redo the patch with the above two conversion rules and blame any breakage on you :-p Regards, Ren=E9
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADL2u4hVqSafxYhts%2BP3jLZgyfy%2B2djeBdi53_8V4MEWHttFcw>