Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 01:46:52 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can you switch from CLang back to gcc in FreeBSD 10.0 Message-ID: <20140109014652.04f208bc@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <52CDE131.90804@fjl.co.uk> References: <52CDB91E.4060107@fjl.co.uk> <20140108225833.4088ee56@gumby.homeunix.com> <52CDE131.90804@fjl.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:37:21 +0000 Frank Leonhardt wrote: > On 08/01/2014 22:58, RW wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 20:46:22 +0000 > > Frank Leonhardt wrote: > > > >> I've been dreading this for over a year now. > > Any particular reason why you have to build the base system with > > gcc? > > > >> It's going to reach > >> critical soon. FreeBSD 10 is dropping gcc in favour of Clang > > > > I don't think that's quite true: > > > > > > <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-September/044313.html>; > > > > As I understand it (and I haven't tried it, hence my question), all > that does is build gcc along with the other stuff. It doesn't make > gcc the default (only) compiler. Sean's editing of /etc/make.conf > goes some way > - or even hacking sys.mk. However, /usr/bin/cc wouldn't be linked to > gcc for a start, I think the canonical way of building world with gcc is to set WITHOUT_CLANG_IS_CC (it's discussed in the thread I quoted) there's also WITHOUT_CLANG.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140109014652.04f208bc>