Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:35:51 +0300 From: Alexei <root@sovetnik.org> To: "Artyom Viklenko" <artem@aws-net.org.ua> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re[6]: mpd pppoe client problems Message-ID: <338990136.20061213113551@sovetnik.org> In-Reply-To: <53106.217.12.197.82.1165998342.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> References: <166800308.20061212122746@sovetnik.org> <50521.217.12.197.82.1165919086.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> <1553703324.20061212134138@sovetnik.org> <59764.217.12.197.82.1165920505.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> <web-348724528@backend4.aha.ru> <51033.217.12.197.82.1165988784.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> <1374382666.20061213100122@sovetnik.org> <53106.217.12.197.82.1165998342.squirrel@sigma.interami.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Artyom. 13 =D0=B4=D0=B5=D0=BA=D0=B0=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2006 =D0=B3., 11:25:42 you wr= ote: > Do you really need all this stuff?.. :/ > I would try to disable this inet-up.sh script at all > and check. It seems that some command in it hangs > and mpd waits for the script to finish and so it can't > be killed by SIGTERM. Ok, I'll try. > Why do you use ipnat and ipfw? May be better to > use one firewall? ipfilter itself or ipfw with natd > or ng-nat. I used to use ipfw as a firewall.. and natd makes too heavy cpu load. > I'm not shure but ipfilter allow to define rules with > interfaces which does not exist at the time of > firewall activation (at least PF can). > Also, you don't need to restart ntpd each time > your interface goes up. Same for named and apache. > Typically. May be you have some very interesting > requirements to do so?.. Em.. Well.. After system startup there is no external interface (ng or tun) to bind to. How can I make those applications bind to the new interface after it gone up? --=20 Grats, Alexei mailto:root@sovetnik.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?338990136.20061213113551>