Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:22:02 +0200 From: clutton <clutton@zoho.com> To: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org, marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/187185: lang/ruby-doc-stdlib: fails to fetch, checksum mismatch Message-ID: <1394464922.70967.33.camel@eva02> In-Reply-To: <531C7FB4.9080108@marino.st> References: <201403020322.s223MEs4078283@freefall.freebsd.org> <1394375957.51067.5.camel@eva02.mbsd> <531C7FB4.9080108@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-C0CJIUcIDqlqlC5CwLQ5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 15:50 +0100, John Marino wrote: > On 3/9/2014 15:39, clutton wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 03:22 +0000, edwin@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> Synopsis: lang/ruby-doc-stdlib: fails to fetch, checksum mismatch > >> > >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ruby > >> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > >> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Mar 2 03:22:13 UTC 2014 > >> Responsible-Changed-Why:=20 > >> Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) > >=20 > > They re-roll the archive without changing any number. > > What do you mean by =C2=ABcopy at LOCAL/swills=C2=BB? > >=20 >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html > Chapter 4.2 (freefall ~/public_distfiles) > MASTER_SITES=3D LOCAL/swills in that case >=20 > It will become static at that point. > John >=20 > P.S. "Reroll" by definition means changing the contents of the archive > without giving it a new file name. It if got a new filename, it > wouldn't be re-rolled, that would be the first roll. I really don't like that approach, because it's a documentation and since it's fetcheble no one will assume that it's the outdated version. It's better to remove that port at all. If you think that it should be done in that way, go ahead... I'm little disappointed, I updated that port to the current state because having local documentation is always quicker then reading the remote version. But It's just a waste of time doing updates like that. It's better to read the remote version then. My proposal is that: let's update it now, then we'll see how often it'll require attention. Too often means removing the port. --=-C0CJIUcIDqlqlC5CwLQ5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJTHdiaAAoJECNkWbjnbjuim5IP/0lk83yib8bPQAdF/CkJ1nkM Q+4HAs6mTUDEBFpyzrrFsKIEegu6gGs2W7ttoVLThMOYi36D+YzTqRrKEpKOxMmA Lc2Kn2SsenPEsaVXKbbIwemWLj59/l2FRpiB+rr+we+A8KpENjJpDzo2oOMeK3vK XFrDPdwv0ZKQDg/O488idU9kJuhS6rLT71rpLWjI1lz4yC0VcJ4XDXrWKv19FhZn 4RRXME5TL/z9kkZ2btATlXV/SFG1UwmOv1aBe4XsBcB7YNvpMTdwP8cyXPfnxEzQ xeCQgoX0eC252baIapKX09MfgZw8vVty9J+a2M2AEISG37Cvw7ncAQQulyZIm0Ym 32FbKKFrObkBODGajXyDf87vw3KQMrywTEyVlwgfRvSl8Sammlsd9Bvtn3Kq1bZ4 ChA8YP7/fVP6pxVbubrckPXfesW6zEZlx0sXh3PyCWyFky8X9Y8rMaVgUxcFgeiO 5PzXCuRpJ+Y9nvSN/dacm0RX8CRh2JkfLlEJgXirXniegc/t8iCuV2HI91rFjW/7 OSgB8YI2mXwrX+DJ/l+590Bqy9dNmTYlyBqTJtva+6+sLQ4ECUJXYVjQpvRC2InC PUTvlZmki7b1xLkz3IZ08vva2Oa5d+efTql5DHsUy961zhq6kwU6s7NGfluaorVB x4TgkhkQ6d2jj+0f5fMG =yTcz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-C0CJIUcIDqlqlC5CwLQ5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1394464922.70967.33.camel>