Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 22:14:17 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion Message-ID: <20140524201417.GK2341@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <5380F792.2040301@sorbs.net> References: <2318877.ATaMhzlr5B@desktop.reztek> <1521997.Va510XRLDQ@desktop.reztek> <534AD94A.2030105@marino.st> <2827292.qM76QHi0yk@workstation.reztek> <20140524180557.GF2341@home.opsec.eu> <5380F792.2040301@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > They just need converting to a staged environment? If so if you'd like > to take a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=189880 and > tell me if I did it right and tell me how I can choose something that > no-one is working on I'll crack on with some of them. I test-build the stuff you submitted and it looks fine. What's the reason there are so many different pgpool-II ports ? Can they be consolidated ? > > Provide PRs, send me a Cc: and I can have a look at them. > I'm happy to help when I have time (today I could have probably got > through 10 'easy' ones).. however having never done it before and no > actual feedback of what I have done as I have now updated 2 (one new > one, one add a patch to an existing one) .. I don't know if I'd even get > it right... that said my poudriere VMs and jenkins are not complaining > about what I have done (I patch auto-manually (scripted) after each > portsnap) I think the pgpool one is fine! Have you've been in contact with the maintainer for pgpool-II, kuriyama@ ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140524201417.GK2341>