Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 13:28:25 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> Cc: FreeBSD Ports List <ports@freebsd.org>, Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org> Subject: Re: splitting subversion port? Message-ID: <529603013.20140608132825@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <53938354.3090806@gmx.de> References: <CALd%2BdccJVqa2MnzQw5PyEA47M3Uvn9QGpaCF8f1cT3FXgwm7_Q@mail.gmail.com> <475041294.20140607211015@serebryakov.spb.ru> <53938354.3090806@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, olli. You wrote 8 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD=D1=8F 2014 =D0=B3., 1:25:40: oh> This should be possible if the old pkg tools are no longer supported oh> (this year Sept.) and code for sub packages is in the tree. oh> Splitting the package now into several ports is not a preferred way. oh> Building a full blown subversion triggers without sub packages x times = a full oh> build for every single shaped port (see for example bacula server/clien= t) It is not exactly so in subversion case. Yes, "configure" step will be performed for each ports, and it is not very fast step, but after that each port will build only what it need to build: look at subversion bindings now. Bindings ports doesn't build libraries & Ko, only binding. It could be done same way for mod_dav_svn & Ko, etc. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?529603013.20140608132825>