Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Sep 2014 00:52:27 +0400
From:      Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>
To:        Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        toolchain@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: clang makes segfaulting code with -march=core2 on i386
Message-ID:  <54135D0B.7060701@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <54135B24.5040905@freebsd.org>
References:  <54130AD0.8090103@freebsd.org> <A212D7AF-4DA7-4043-BB73-1746A5C2F42F@FreeBSD.org> <54133E1E.9030105@freebsd.org> <54135B24.5040905@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On 13.09.2014 0:44, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 12.09.2014 22:40, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> I don't have -current & i386 combination, but I can try -current & x64 later (with different -march).
> 
> It works on -current, amd64, -march=core2. So it either -stable or
> i386-specific clang bug.
> 

I forget to say that real CPU on -current tested is not the same as for
failing i386: QuadCore Intel Core i7-3820

-- 
http://ache.vniz.net/


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUE10LAAoJEKUckv0MjfbK/xoH/2AnjfsqF8tw9lS1wyMZyLDL
+3lu2jxBYt2Ft6DumEEh37XBhMor7ayYDq4x/TrQ/UMhIQqukdYERJ7sTU6iJ6tE
njzEHPXtrD1Sum/IPoLIBcvwvbwMXvelh4ujGii40Q2BiW8i4tmL0okfB8YhThBl
0h1vUv719cds3htlzoILbFImRPQF1Xp6CQljx40FEy/WpHb0zn+PQDom0gQDJkMc
/hPqaL/h2SSkXSLqvX5K9tW/bTP1wo//JNDPyaUYiILdod2l97IBMsF2e9jEQ1Is
1i88nVzZO++mxPMwVPcLyt8Xjk+p0quD41xQPlCZEpuh1BebROFfvO/vP5uAJQo=
=bVbf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54135D0B.7060701>