Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:02:51 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, Daniel Lovasko <daniel.lovasko@gmail.com> Subject: Re: DDB Improvements Message-ID: <4592683.iJopXWX9Je@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <54F5BE20.2020400@selasky.org> References: <CA%2BcSnN0hGy=25vKBNpJfJf-DPFK4BvijeT%2BF28miVhB%2B_gVrog@mail.gmail.com> <54F5BE20.2020400@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, March 03, 2015 02:58:56 PM Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 03/03/15 14:54, Daniel Lovasko wrote: > > Hello hackers, > > > > I would like to reach out to all DDB users here: what are the things > > (or just one single thing) that you would like to improve in DDB? > > Ranging from UI to code quality, missing features to obsoleted > > features. > > Hi, > > When there are multiple cores, an easy way to see the complete backtrace > of the other cores, and not only the panicing one? tr <pid> doesn't work for you? (You can use 'show pcpu <x>' or 'show all pcpu' to figure out curthread for CPU and then pass that tid or pid to 'tr') -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4592683.iJopXWX9Je>