Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:22:04 -0400
From:      PK1048 <info@pk1048.com>
To:        FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org>
Subject:   Re: NFS & ZFS: how to export whole FS hierarhy to mount it with one command on client?
Message-ID:  <FBF978E4-89F4-46A9-AA8D-4BDB945460E8@pk1048.com>
In-Reply-To: <55BF597E.9020903@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <795246861.20150801140429@serebryakov.spb.ru> <D1BD0ED3-C33E-494D-AE40-01EF910197D1@kraus-haus.org> <55BF597E.9020903@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sent from my portable device

> On Aug 3, 2015, at 08:07, Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>=20
>> On 03.08.2015 05:10, Paul Kraus wrote:
>>=20
>> Why are you using one zfs dataset per user ? That was a
>> recommendation very early on in the days of zfs before user level
>> quotas. Other than the ability to snapshot individual user=E2=80=99s home=

>> directories, what is that configuration getting you ?
>  Different block sizes ("recordsize"), different compression,
> different snapshot policy. I don't need quotes at all, but I need all
> of these.

I thought these were home directories, what are users putting here that need=
 different turnings ?=20

Remember that "recordsize" is not block size, but a maximum suggested record=
size. ZFS will use what it considers the best recordsize for each write at h=
and.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FBF978E4-89F4-46A9-AA8D-4BDB945460E8>