Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:58:21 -0400 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> Cc: FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: port's svn commit: r413746 - in head "many ports: mark broken on powerpc64": for what toolchains? Message-ID: <572216FD.9030700@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <571D0146.5060200@FreeBSD.org> References: <34C0599F-044B-46ED-AF60-0F0E98876E2F@dsl-only.net> <571C0297.3050801@FreeBSD.org> <28FDFFB4-02CC-40CB-ACAC-828BA8E71A37@dsl-only.net> <00621189-D577-4E3F-8BAB-4B315B690209@dsl-only.net> <571CC2F2.2060601@FreeBSD.org> <F7E6ED93-A73D-406D-A7BF-B1B80C61871F@dsl-only.net> <571D0146.5060200@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I did test this, but it failed. The log is here: http://poudriere.mouf.net/karl/poudriere/data/headpowerpc-default/2016-04-27_12h19m39s/logs/gcc6-devel-6.0.0.s20160320.log Looks like gfortran failed to build? Steve On 04/24/16 01:24 PM, Steve Wills wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/24/16 10:16 AM, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> For all the port update activity (including ruby) I used gcc49, /etc/make.conf being: >> >> # more /etc/make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.22 >> WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/portswork >> WITH_DEBUG= >> WITH_DEBUG_FILES= >> MALLOC_PRODUCTION= >> # >> # >> # For trying gcc49... >> # >> CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc49 >> CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++49 >> CPP=/usr/local/bin/cpp49 >> . . . (binutils macros omitted here) . . . >> >> >> (I do not know if lang/gcc [or lang/gcc48] would work or not. I >> prefer a tool chain with a more modern C++ available but gcc49 is not >> yet what lang/gcc builds.) >> >> >> >> I've seen notation like: >> >> USE_GCC= 4.9+ >> >> in port Makefiles. Also notation like: >> >> .if ${ARCH} == powerpc64 >> >> and: >> >> .if ${ARCH} == "powerpc" || ${ARCH} == "powerpc64" >> >> >> So may be the extra notation in the Makefile(s) in question could be something like: >> >> # clang 3.8.0 and before is still broken in various ways for powerpc and powerpc64: >> .if ${ARCH} == "powerpc" || ${ARCH} == "powerpc64" >> USE_GCC= 4.9+ >> .endif >> > > Yep, this sounds right to me. I will test this with at least lang/ruby22 > and lang/gcc6-devel when my current build finishes, or sooner if I get > impatient. :) > > >> I list both powerpc variants because powerpc and powerpc64 both have >> clang problems making buildworld a no-go by default and if gcc 4.2.1 >> rejects a port for one it would normally also reject for the other. >> There may be other ${ARCH} values that would also be appropriate >> because they are also stuck at gcc 4.2.1 . > > Makes sense. > >> I do not claim to know necessary vs. sufficient status: more might be >> needed for some configurations (rpath issues? mixture of libraries >> compiled by distinct gcc's?). But I expect that the above should be >> better than being marked broken. > > We'll find this out when we test! :) > > Thanks, > Steve >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?572216FD.9030700>