Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 20:09:38 -0400 From: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> To: Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 in jail on amd64 Message-ID: <20120525000937.GA1377@schism.local> In-Reply-To: <58333.128.135.70.6.1337903105.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <4FBEAC50.4020703@speakeasy.org> <CAAN28g1tRFg4n8x4Qm%2B%2BEWdKqtjqabZMQ0YuoM9v85zg36uR9g@mail.gmail.com> <58333.128.135.70.6.1337903105.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:45:05PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Is there any reason to not use virtual machine (e.g. VirtualBox) with real > i386 in it instead of jail? Just curious. Overhead of VirtualBox. Glen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120525000937.GA1377>