Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 02:10:05 +0000 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@mac.com> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: default gcc conformance mode Message-ID: <20030228021005.B10850@chiark.greenend.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <5966486.1046381243011.JavaMail.leimy2k@mac.com>; from leimy2k@mac.com on Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:27:23PM -0600 References: <5966486.1046381243011.JavaMail.leimy2k@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:27:23PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote: > On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 11:24AM, Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: > >Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> writes: > >> Should the default conformance mode of gcc be C99+extensions rather > >> than C89+extensions? This would make the -pedantic option more useful. > > > >I think some would argue against it, since we don't have a complete > >C99 library yet. > > I welcome the day when this is possible but I don't think we are ready yet. > I agree with Mike. OK, it's no big deal. I'll just set my own bondage-and-discipline CFLAGS accordingly :-) Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ HUMBER THAMES DOVER: SOUTHERLY 4 OR 5 INCREASING 6 OR 7. OCCASIONAL RAIN. MODERATE, OCCASIONALLY POOR. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030228021005.B10850>