Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 03:47:05 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Michael Grimm <trashcan@ellael.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd Message-ID: <5A528749.9070308@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <5A5284CC.9050400@quip.cz> References: <76627A89-D7E9-4010-910B-5F25886E7E7E@ellael.org> <5A523873.2050001@quip.cz> <5A524855.2040901@grosbein.net> <5A5284CC.9050400@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
08.01.2018 3:36, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> There IS consensus on modifying config files while upgrade and it is written in our Porter's Handbook: >> only unmodified files may be changes with upgrade. Any other behaviour is a bug that should be fixed. > > If it is that simple then tell me how it is possible that for many years there are repetitive discussions > and many ports with many commits violating this "rule"? Because: 1) People are lazy and make errors creating ports violating Porter's handbook instructions; 2) People are lazy and do not create formal Problem Reports even when they are annoyed hoping that SomeOne (TM) would do that for them. Where are your PRs?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A528749.9070308>