Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:08:56 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> To: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bhyve and arp problem Message-ID: <B6E929F2-C2F0-4877-9B67-3910D19A4943@cs.huji.ac.il> In-Reply-To: <5AC25809.30205@omnilan.de> References: <201804021611.w32GB9G4083257@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <5AC25809.30205@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 2 Apr 2018, at 19:19, Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> wrote:
>
> Bezüglich Rodney W. Grimes's Nachricht vom 02.04.2018 18:11 (localtime):
>>> Bez?glich Daniel Braniss's Nachricht vom 02.04.2018 16:58 (localtime):
>>>
>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you trying to use the HOSTS ip address in the GUEST?
>>>>
>>>> the client is using the server?s /usr/local, which is mounted via nfs.
>>>
>>> I guess you have reasons to prefer nfs over nullfs.
>>
>> You can not nullfs mount from inside a bhyve guest the host file
>> system would be his reason.
>
> Doh, of course – I mind-mixed with jails… Almost all my FreeBSD
> "guests" on a bhyve(8) host are jails... Please simply ignore ;-)
>
>
> …
>>> your results... Else I can't explain what you see other than the above
>>> scenario.
>>
>> Is it still true that if you have a bridge hooked to an interface
>> you must move the IP assignement from the interace device to the
>> bridge?
>
> I have no idea, I haven't used if_bridge(4) for some years. Perferably
> I use vale(4) (if I don't need .11q) or ng_bridge(4) for bhyve(8) setups.
>
> -harry
maybe this could be the cause:
on the server, every time a client is started iI see:
kernel: bridge0: error setting interface capabilities on mlxen0
and BTW, with the latest kernel, there is only one complaint about arp moving!
danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B6E929F2-C2F0-4877-9B67-3910D19A4943>