Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 21:08:50 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Abdullah Tariq <ab.tariq90@gmail.com> Subject: Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help Message-ID: <c2d147cb-122a-4c27-299a-7c518ef1c01e@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5AE75BAD.8030303@grosbein.net> References: <CAPFxuwQOBkGTHZbGfJz=-fUW8M%2BQGOpTM9T%2B-RO6H4fWcGEtqA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE34754.6040905@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwQ5TwZnnW%2B1TT7urq_0pgb=sM_VwH4x0eq0363MCdb7hw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE34CFA.7000207@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwR54nPiKAAACRY5a_GvDNOVfdniqv6F_3PK4--7vm03uA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE437C1.8010706@grosbein.net> <CAFZYVy7_nVm5G1XDdM_TujN=jVbCyDEKABGbC=M9L5Lh1jAAzQ@mail.gmail.com> <5AE44ADD.7020302@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwQ=Gi7GiVr%2BsdTavr6r44ftaeFDOvN7%2B3qi_7aZyH6kXw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE468D5.9030702@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwRdLrEmtVHGSruja6L-bcOi0Z59ae5mB1gWgi-PvU6inw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ6m=j6aY7nbeppCK9TTAJ1P%2BfN7Hs5sZ3CfWc7Ad4v_cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ62BQ3WZVvpZ0D9UJFcV4stXm-prE=GDp-JconSktQzpA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE4D1AC.3080702@grosbein.net> <CAOjFWZ7AchG8HEvURSNGXGeqYiYaSn4Uo=rBgGoFqLAbAdOMJw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE75988.3020306@grosbein.net> <CAOjFWZ7uAPJ3EaoLktQ%2BBVTBt7LrKjmhK0FpCY6X3u%2B0YWYGGQ@mail.gmail.com> <5AE75BAD.8030303@grosbein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/5/18 2:08 am, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 01.05.2018 1:03, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net <mailto:eugen@grosbein.net>>wrote: >> >> > What the OP is trying to do is have PC1 send untagged packets to igb0 on FreeBSD which is configured for tagged vlan 5. >> > Then bridge the packets to igb1 which is also configured for tagged vlan 5. Then send the packets out, untagged, to PC2. >> >> Why would one want to "configure igb0 for tagged vlan 5" when igb0 supposed to receive untagged frames? >> This does not make any sense. One should just bridge igb0 as is, without creation vlan on it and problem's solved. >> >> Yes, agree. What the OP wants to do can't be done. :) > Perhaps, you missed a message from him when he states that configuration style does no matter for him really. > So, what he wants can be done, just using different style. > a picture would do wonders to understand what he wants. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c2d147cb-122a-4c27-299a-7c518ef1c01e>