Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:00:09 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, spil.oss@gmail.com Cc: Michael <bsdannounce@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problems with IPv6-less kernel and world Message-ID: <200702102100.11768.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <5fbf03c20702101108p686ed116n90fbdf26308f0e55@mail.gmail.com> References: <5fbf03c20702021132y5f931f5esdeab22d0048fa5a6@mail.gmail.com> <45C9A73C.1020409@gmail.com> <5fbf03c20702101108p686ed116n90fbdf26308f0e55@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 10 February 2007 17:08, Spil Oss wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Well, actually I'm proposing a change to the GENERIC kernel and > make.conf.example to add to the comment that one should add > WITHOUT_IPV6 to the make.conf if you enable NO_INET6. > > That sounds to me like something completely different than contacting > all port-maintainers. > even if ipv6 is a real situation it is not the standard, ipv4 is, then, eve= n=20 if ipv6 is some network's standard it is not a global standard, ipv4 is certainly then, it makes no sense that ipv6 is the default, neither for=20 applications nor for the kernel also certain then is that ipv6 is an ADDITIONAL option and who wants it, ne= eds=20 to enable it, either for applications as for the kernel, not the inverse=20 situation as today but this is not only a FBSD wiredness but a general confusion ... but so far as it matters to FBSD it is funny how many core/OS parts simply= =20 ignore NO_INET6 even if set ...=20 =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702102100.11768.joao>