Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:33:37 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.9R patch request (was 4.9 stability) Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.0.20030919123123.0370bb98@209.112.4.2> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20030919094717.0326f068@209.112.4.2> References: <3F6A98F3.7080801@freebsd.org> <6.0.0.22.0.20030919094717.0326f068@209.112.4.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
This is the sort of simple patch I mean
--- /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src/version.c.orig Fri Sep 19 12:27:42
2003
+++ /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src/version.c Fri Sep 19 12:27:52 2003
@@ -15,4 +15,4 @@
SM_RCSID("@(#)$Id: version.c,v 8.104.2.15 2003/03/19 21:19:53 ca Exp $")
-char Version[] = "8.12.9";
+char Version[] = "8.12.9p1";
Otherwise, there is no simple way for most end users to know if they have a
safe version of sendmail.
---Mike
At 09:51 AM 19/09/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>At 01:49 AM 19/09/2003, Scott Long wrote:
>>All,
>>
>>We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9.
>
>We were seeing the problems prior to Sept 3, but things are stable (small
>s) for us now.
>
>>time to speak up and get the problems resolved so that we can make the
>>deadline by next weekend.
>
>I would really like to see sendmail 8.12.10 imported and MFCd prior to
>release. Or at least adjust the version string of the binary so that the
>user knows its patched and not vulnerable similar to what was done for 4.8R
>
>
> ---Mike
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.0.22.0.20030919123123.0370bb98>