Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:14:07 +0000 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ? Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.2.20040226204904.03d1acf8@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.0.20040226145453.06e6ae30@209.112.4.2> References: <6.0.3.0.0.20040226131930.10513908@209.112.4.2> <6.0.1.1.2.20040226192403.03dddb28@gid.co.uk> <6.0.3.0.0.20040226145453.06e6ae30@209.112.4.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 19:57 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote: >At 02:26 PM 26/02/2004, Bob Bishop wrote: >>Hi, >> >>At 18:25 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote: >>> >>>em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid [etc] >> >>FWIW I get something very similar under 5.2.1-RC2 on my shiny new >>ThinkPad T41, so it's likely just not recognised. > >Actually, I worked around the problem by swapping its location with an fxp >next to it. For some reason the em does not seem to like sharing its >interrupt with agp0 ? The fxp seems happy enough to do it however. Oh great. All the PCI devices on my TP are sharing int 11, but it all works fine under WinXP. Maybe I should try without ACPI... -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 989 4254
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.1.1.2.20040226204904.03d1acf8>