Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:32:07 +0100 From: Henning Brauer <henning@openbsd.org> To: Earl Lapus <earl.lapus@gmail.com> Cc: Ryan Thomas McBride <mcbride@cvs.openbsd.org>, Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org>, Henning Brauer <henning@openbsd.org>, mlaier@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pfctl Message-ID: <20061128103208.27333.qmail@nudo.bsws.de> In-Reply-To: <604f76120611271740g61c1a3a4pe8e9d37ab1df3f28@mail.gmail.com> References: <604f76120611270203n3d065114vdbe8487cc04357e1@mail.gmail.com> <20061127125022.GA5690@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20061127142312.17227.qmail@nudo.bsws.de> <604f76120611271740g61c1a3a4pe8e9d37ab1df3f28@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Earl Lapus <earl.lapus@gmail.com> [2006-11-28 02:41]: > I read that realtime must always be convex. That explains the checking. > However, linkshare and upperlimit can be either concave or convex. correct > If linkshare(lssc_xx) can be concave then we should allow lssc_m1 to be > less than lssc_m2 even if lssc_m1 is greater than zero. And this also > applies > to upperlimit (ulsc_xx). Is this correct? for a concave (m1 < m2), hfsc allows only m1 == 0 for simplicity. (had to check that with kenjiro :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061128103208.27333.qmail>