Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:20:07 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: struct timex and Linux adjtimex() Message-ID: <X8i715mJUphnxXEo@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <60532.1606990671@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <202012030523.0B35NsG7003810@slippy.cwsent.com> <X8i4UIzzH7vxkKvH@kib.kiev.ua> <60532.1606990671@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:17:51AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > Konstantin Belousov writes: > > > 1. Implement new syscall, which would take extended struct timex. > > ntp_adjtimex() perhaps should be kept for backward compatibility. > > [It does not matter where struct timeval is placed in the updated > > struct timex, see below]. > > That would break all ports with timekeeping software. Why ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?X8i715mJUphnxXEo>