Date: 06 Mar 2006 10:11:40 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: "Robert Uzzi" <ruzzi@compedgeracing.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d startup files structure changed? Message-ID: <44pskzhakz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <61018.207.70.139.52.1141626225.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> References: <61018.207.70.139.52.1141626225.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Robert Uzzi" <ruzzi@compedgeracing.com> writes: > What is with the changes with the naming structure of the rc.d files? > after some updates I found that courier-authdaemond.sh had been renamed to > courier-authdaemond and pure-ftpd.sh to pure-ftpd. Is the structure > changing to not require the .sh extention to start on bootup? It's slightly more complicated than that. The two styles work a little differently. See the manual for rc(8) (and rcorder(8)) if you want the details.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44pskzhakz.fsf>