Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 03:39:31 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, jdp@polstra.com Subject: Re: ftp://freefall.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/LOCAL_PORTS Message-ID: <199704251039.DAA24764@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <6128.861964240@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Make ftp.freebsd.org the primary site and let the backups be any * mirrors we can get for it. I'm sure we can get at least the * neosoft mirror to replicate it (ftp3.freebsd.org). I'm talking about the "regular" backup as defined in MASTER_SITE_BACKUP. What's wrong with using hub? We can have one site in the Makefile, plus the regular backup on ftp.freebsd.org or wherever the user choses in /etc/make.conf. Just like any other port. And if you mean have two sites in the Makefile, unless both those names are symbolic (e.g., ftp-local and ftp-local2), I wouldn't want to do that. (Or we have to edit all the Makefiles again when we change ftp3's name or something.) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704251039.DAA24764>