Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:28:34 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? Message-ID: <hf0h9q$lm4$3@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <6201873e0911300524hd2d0e99l1c8655279744934@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> <20091130094315.GA94119@icarus.home.lan> <20091130112912.000016c1@unknown> <4B13B170.7030103@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <6201873e0911300524hd2d0e99l1c8655279744934@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Vande More wrote: > I think it's fairly well known disk io isn't FreeBSD's strong suit, but it's > not quite as bad as it looks. There is some low-hanging fruit here. If you > where to actually tune ZFS as recommended you'd see stronger results and > hopefully ahci will be enabled by default soon as it is a nice performance > increase in concurre Yes, ZFS+AHCI should give significantly better results on any such test. Though I doubt it would be enough to match Linux results.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hf0h9q$lm4$3>