Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 15:22:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> To: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, pstef@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changes to ps -d? Message-ID: <375102065.5853.1695129769542@localhost> In-Reply-To: <634385E4-6E9A-410F-9BDC-2E2B97A8C46F@grem.de> References: <925097787.3785.1695119378729@localhost> <634385E4-6E9A-410F-9BDC-2E2B97A8C46F@grem.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
------=_Part_5852_284312331.1695129769444 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Van: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Datum: dinsdag, 19 september 2023 13:01 Aan: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> CC: pstef@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: changes to ps -d? > > > > > >> On 19. Sep 2023, at 12:30, Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1]. >> I could use "ps axd -p <pid>" to see the process tree of some ongoing task. >> In current this has changed to always need an extra option "ps axd -p <pid> -D down". Can this become the default again? At least when -d is used. >> > > > There was a discussion on the FreeBSD-current mailing list that lead to the decision to make this change: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-July/004071.html > > Best > Thanks, I missed that conversation. Curious about the meaning of "would be the best in that -d would go back to what it was" in https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004277.html. Currently in "ps -d -p <pid>" -d is not back at what it was. Regards, Ronald. ------=_Part_5852_284312331.1695129769444 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><head></head><body><br> <p><strong>Van:</strong> Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de><br> <strong>Datum:</strong> dinsdag, 19 september 2023 13:01<br> <strong>Aan:</strong> Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws><br> <strong>CC:</strong> pstef@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org<br> <strong>Onderwerp:</strong> Re: changes to ps -d?</p> <blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px"> <div class="MessageRFC822Viewer" id="P"> <div class="MultipartAlternativeViewer"> <div class="TextHTMLViewer" id="P.P.P"> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div> <div> </div> <blockquote>On 19. Sep 2023, at 12:30, Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> wrote:<br> </blockquote> </div> <blockquote> <div>Hi,<br> <br> In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1].<br> I could use "ps axd -p <pid>" to see the process tree of some ongoing task.<br> In current this has changed to always need an extra option "ps axd -p <pid> -D down". Can this become the default again? At least when -d is used.<br> </div> </blockquote> <div> </div> <div>There was a discussion on the FreeBSD-current mailing list that lead to the decision to make this change:</div> <div> </div> <div><a href="https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-July/004071.html">https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-July/004071.html</a></div>; <div> </div> <div>Best</div> <div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> <br> <br> Thanks, I missed that conversation.<br> Curious about the meaning of "would be the best in that -d would go back to what it was" in https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004277.html.<br>; <br> Currently in "ps -d -p <pid>" -d is not back at what it was.<br> <br> Regards,<br> Ronald.<br> </body></html> ------=_Part_5852_284312331.1695129769444--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?375102065.5853.1695129769542>