Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 00:28:07 -0400 (EDT) From: matt <matt@MLINK.NET> To: FreeBSD-ADVOCACY <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Company offering FreeBSD on custom built servers. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909090024460.42758-100000@dns02.arpa-canada.net> In-Reply-To: <6357.936848930@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: [...] : What I find most "interesting" is the fact that their choice-box : for "OS" says: : : "For optimum reliability, Rackspace reccommends RedHat Linux 5.2 as : your operating system." This would be disinformation that happens to be floating about everywhere now that RedHat has gone commercial.. : What's *that* all about? What horror stories did they get for FreeBSD : 3.2 that led to such a conclusion, and were any verified and/or : experienced by this particular vendor. And if there weren't horror : stories, then what else might be the motivation behind a statement : like that? I doubt any horror stories have been heard, I honest have never heard anyone dissatisfied with FreeBSD's performance if they've ever used it. The motivation would seem to be money, RedHat is commercial, and has commercial appeal due to it's support for more commercial applications then most UNIX based O/S with the possible exception of Solaris. : All interesting questions... In any case, not exactly a URL I'll be : using for advocacy purposes until I find out. :) I agree totally. : - Jordan -- // Matt Heckaman: matt@mlink.net -OR- admin@arpa-canada.net // // System Administrator/Owner: http://www.arpa-canada.net // To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909090024460.42758-100000>