Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Oct 1998 00:12:37 +0200
From:      Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To:        Reginald Perry <perry@zso.dec.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: PC Magazine 10/20/1998 Article about FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <19981006001237.11507@follo.net>
In-Reply-To: <69CAF7F9AF57D2118D9A0000F881B4DD02F300@zsoexc1.zso.dec.com>; from Reginald Perry on Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 01:53:35PM -0700
References:  <69CAF7F9AF57D2118D9A0000F881B4DD06BB3A@zsoexc1.zso.dec.com> <69CAF7F9AF57D2118D9A0000F881B4DD02F300@zsoexc1.zso.dec.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 01:53:35PM -0700, Reginald Perry wrote:
> They didn't say. This is the relevant paragraph:
> 
> "We tested FreeBSD in one of its most common applications: Web serving. We
> set up two Dell PowerEdge 2200 servers with 128MB RAM and a single Pentium
> II CPU, installing FreeBSD with Apache 1.3.0 on one and Windows NT 4.0 with
> IIS 4.0 on the other. On our ZD WebBench 2.0 tests, performance leveled off
> quickly; memory was the bottleneck for both NOSs. FreeBSD outperformed
> Windows NT by a sizable margin, however, as you increase RAM, Windows NT
> surpasses FreeBSD because of a cache limitation in Apache and FreeBSD."
> 
> At the bottom of the page, is a WebBench graph of clients on the X axis and
> requests/second on the Y axis that shows both leveling off at about 8
> clients with NT starting to level off above 4 clients and FreeBSD leveling
> off very sharply at 8 clients. The level is at ~200 requests/second for NT
> and ~600 requests/second for FreeBSD, if I am extrapolating this graph
> correctly. The graph measures out to 60 clients. Of course they failed to
> show a graph for average maximum requests/second vs. amount of RAM.

So FreeBSD has about 3x higher performance than NT on the same hardware?

Anyway; 600 requests/second is about 10MBit/(600*8) = 2184 bytes
transfer per request.  This fit pretty well with the fact that they're
trying to emulate a typical web-server load (according to the WebBench
description at http://www.zdnet.com/zdbop/webbench/1main/1wrktree.htm).

If that is IT (ie, they're using a 10MBit NIC) I'm not surprised at
the sharp cutoff - I'd expect a sharp cut-off around the capacity of
the network :-)

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981006001237.11507>