Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 11:32:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com> Cc: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: y2k compliance version Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9905171125240.15052-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB44011058A6@site2s1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Christopher Michaels wrote: > Does that imply that 2.2.8 isn't y2k compliant? I thought that 2.2.8 was > still going to be supported for "critical updates" It is, it lives on in 2.2-STABLE. Check the individual PRs cited on the Y2K page and the CVS respository for info. Verifying each one of those PRs will take me the rest of the day. I'm going by dates only. Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.03.9905171125240.15052-100000>